Pages

Tuesday, December 12, 2006

Bugger-In-Chief



From Kausfiles at Slate.com comes Clintonites Bug Di .

Mickey Kaus raises raises many questions (and provides many links) about Clinton NSA's secret spying on a member of the Royal Family:

Was there a warrant?

Was the secret spying approved by Congress beforehand?

What did "President" Rodham know about it and when did she know it?

Why bug Princess Di over her relationship over her relationship with a US billionaire Ted Forstmann?

I don't know about you, but I can't wait to hear the explanation the Clintonistas will come up with to hide the fact that the Clintons used the full extent of the presidency for perversion and strong-arm tactics to further their quest for power.

17 comments:

  1. Of course there was no warrant, no problem when the Clinton's were bugging.

    Also had heard even the Carter Administration did bugging without a warrant.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Now that we absolutely have to spy on terrorists, these hypocrites decide it's a violation of civil rights.

    Not just that, but I'm sure Bubba had his ulterior motives for his late night wiretaps and no one said peep about it.

    Just disgusting.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Gah! I can't even stand the hypocrisy any more.

    I'm just going through my comments. I know that I started commenting on your blog because I thought your comments on Jamie Dawn's blog were funny and I wanted to see what your blog was like :-) Have you heard from JD lately?

    ReplyDelete
  4. jen: nope. I think she said she's be back online in January.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It's ok to spy on people for curiosity. But to help protect our country??? Yeah, that's totally wrong.

    Hypocrazy.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Naw theyll just whine about the NSA all day long..heaven forfend u should eavesdrop on a terrorist eh?!..sick!

    ReplyDelete
  7. i must wonder what, if anything, will become of this? the clintons are and have always been pure evil.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Be careful what you say about them, people die mysteriously after getting their attention!
    And yes they are!

    tmw

    ReplyDelete
  9. phoenix: yes, totally wrong.

    woman: I know, I hate to sound like a malcontent, but where is the outrage over this.

    nanc: we can only hope that one day their evil will be recognized.
    Hope springs eternal.

    tmw: weirdly, I couldn't comment on this post earlier. It kept referring me to: bloggers making racist comments. That really pissed me off.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I'm not happy with the Clintons getting their grubby hands on the FBI files and the lackadaisical treatment of it by the MSM.

    The Clintons used those FBI files to wield power destructively.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Cube- Still can't post on any beta sites. So I think it's us, it's the noxious "them"!
    Could it be google is having hysterics over any negative references to clintonistas, idiots and other assorted non-race types!

    tmw

    ReplyDelete
  12. Amazing. GOSSIP is cool, but national security? We wouldn't want to offend any terrorists, now would we.

    Of course, this is simply all about how if you're a lefista, anything goes, and it goes with impunity.

    ReplyDelete
  13. tmw: Perhaps it is. I don't know. I'm still angry about the 'bloggers making racist remarks' thing that happened yesterday.

    ReplyDelete
  14. brooke: yep. Free speech is only that which the left agrees with, anything else is just hateful.

    ReplyDelete