Pages

▼

Thursday, February 16, 2006

Wax PIAPS

The pant-suited one serves as inspiration for the newest dummy to grace Madame Tussaud's Wax Museum in Midtown.

Go to the New York Post.online if you want to read this puff piece.
at

17 comments:

  1. JenFebruary 16, 2006 1:08 PM

    Those look like pajamas...

    ReplyDelete
  2. cubeFebruary 16, 2006 1:59 PM

    That's creepy, but they do look like silk pajamas. Ick.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousFebruary 16, 2006 2:28 PM

    I went to a wax musuem in Florida right before it closed. It was pretty neat.aya

    ReplyDelete
  4. MartiFebruary 16, 2006 4:24 PM

    LOL It seems universal - I was going to say (heck AM going to say LOL) that it looks like she's wearing pajamas.

    ReplyDelete
  5. tlmFebruary 16, 2006 6:08 PM

    Does that woman ever wear a dress?...

    Or a skirt?

    Does she have hairy gorilla knees or something? Hmm.

    ReplyDelete
  6. KarenFebruary 16, 2006 7:38 PM

    She's never been style savvy.

    ReplyDelete
  7. cubeFebruary 16, 2006 7:48 PM

    For me, that she wears pants is the least unattractive thing about Hill. I don't care one fig about that. I can think of so many other objectionable traits... Oy, don't get me started.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Jay NoelFebruary 16, 2006 8:50 PM

    The wax figure looks more human than the real one.

    ReplyDelete
  9. CazFebruary 17, 2006 6:44 AM

    OMG - if you ignore the bottom half, she's starting to take on an eerie resemblance to Endora, Samantha's mother on Bewitched. Just add a little bit of eyeliner & turn the collar up a touch higher...

    ReplyDelete
  10. cubeFebruary 17, 2006 8:07 AM

    LOL! I can hear it now... Derwood!

    ReplyDelete
  11. cubeFebruary 17, 2006 8:31 AM

    Funny how no one commented on the screen behind the dummy's head that polls visitors on voting for a woman president.

    Nope, there's no agenda there.

    ReplyDelete
  12. birdwomanFebruary 17, 2006 12:00 PM

    Until I read the comments here, I had no idea who the dummy was.

    She really looks nothing like that.

    (*)>

    ReplyDelete
  13. SarFebruary 17, 2006 2:06 PM

    Believe it or not, I'm not a Hillary fan. She looks so shiny in that suit and glistening wax. Creepy.

    But as for the poll, I do believe we should someday have a woman president. But I'd take Geena Davis before Hillary.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Jamie DawnFebruary 17, 2006 5:42 PM

    Fake... that's right for both the wax & the real versions.

    ReplyDelete
  15. David AmuletFebruary 19, 2006 7:53 AM

    Perhaps I'm the only one who will compliment her for wearing pants. I don't wanna see any more of that than necessary, thank you very much.

    -- david

    ReplyDelete
  16. cubeFebruary 19, 2006 12:04 PM

    sar: Why Hillary? I question why they didn't make a wax effigy of Condi Rice for the woman president exhibit? Now there's a woman I would vote for.

    j.d.: right on. Fake as can be.

    d.a.: thunder thighs & elephantine ankles. ICK! I'm with you! I guess, 'keep your pants on', is good advice for both Clintons ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  17. AnonymousSeptember 25, 2006 4:49 PM

    Please, no Kankle pictures.

    ReplyDelete