thepoodleanddogblog: Right. No form following function. No logic. No method in this madness. It is just plain ugly enough to get you busted by the fashion police and, believe me, I'm not a big fashionista, but even I know this is an offense to the eyes.
If it becomes a fad, which I really doubt, it still wouldn't prompt me to wear the silly things.
Form follows function, but I fail to see any function or logic to these. But if they become a fad I bet a lot of people will buy them.
ReplyDeleteRidiculous? You're being far too kind. Far too kind. Hideous is closer.
ReplyDeleteHave a fabulous day. ☺
Unless that's all she's wearing.
ReplyDeleteHmmm. I can't say they're less attractive than my camo crocs my wife hates me wearing everywhere.
ReplyDeletethepoodleanddogblog: Right. No form following function. No logic. No method in this madness. It is just plain ugly enough to get you busted by the fashion police and, believe me, I'm not a big fashionista, but even I know this is an offense to the eyes.
ReplyDeleteIf it becomes a fad, which I really doubt, it still wouldn't prompt me to wear the silly things.
Sandee: Don't hold back. Tell me what you really think ;)
ReplyDeleteKid: Ewwww, wouldn't that be a turn off? I'm not a guy, but I'm just saying.
ReplyDeleteDaBlade: Your wife is wise. I used to react the same way when my husband wore his 'mandles'.
ReplyDeleteUgh! That about says it all, i think.
ReplyDeleteMessymimi: Ugh! I think that's apt.
ReplyDeleteCube. I'm 62 and I've have NEVER EVER noticed what kind of footwear a woman has on.
ReplyDeleteSeriously.
Kid: Not even heels?
ReplyDeleteNot unless they ask me to look.
ReplyDelete