Wednesday, February 05, 2014

Realistic?



Realistic Statue Of Man In His Underwear At Wellesley College Sparks Controversy

This statue is threatening the girls of Wellesley?

Really?

We're not all married to John Stamos.

You girls need to grow up and stop being such drama queens.

8 comments:

Robin said...

I'm sure all of the same people petitioning for the statue to be removed because it is "sexually threatening" would be the first to petition for it to stay if it were two men hugging it out in their undies. Because that isn't "sexually threatening" in its overt sexuality.

So tired of anyone working for change.org or any similar groups. ::yawn::

cube said...

Robin: You make a great point. I'm sure these Wellesley ladies would be petitioning an homosexual statue.

sue hanes said...

Cube - That is a statue? It looks real to me.

cube said...

Sue Hanes: I don't think I've ever seen a more realistic looking statue. I keep expecting it to move... you know, go get some clothes.

Sandee said...

Opinions are like assh****, everyone has one.

Have a fabulous day. ☺

DaBlade said...

Robin +1. Of course, it's still early, and I think we can safely assume this statue will be the victim of a homosexual predator. As an aside, if you look over the statue's left shoulder, you will see Sandra Fluke on the other side of the street and sobbing in disappointment to learn this gentleman had no contraception, fake or otherwise.

cube said...

Sandee: Assolutely ;-)

cube said...

DaBlade: When I was in university, I worried about mid-terms, finals, and, yes, occasionally boys, but I didn't worry about statues on campus. Please girls, buck up.