Thursday, January 14, 2010

Sanctioned Thuggery



House Resolution 994, Directing the Attorney General to transmit to the House of Representatives all information in the Attorney General's possession relating to the decision to dismiss United States v. New Black Panther Party was rejected.

House Panel Rejects Black Panther Resolution: Vote 15-14

I want to know which representatives voted to reject it, which ones voted for it, and the ones who didn't bother to show up or just voted 'present'. I've searched several sites, even opencongress.org , but haven't found the roll call list.

I will keep looking and will post an update when I find it.

7 comments:

Teresa said...

This is despicable. Whomever voted against the bill is sanctioning thuggery, intimidation, and pure racism. Voter intimidation must not be allowed. This was a slam dunk case until Holder and his minions got a hold of this case. This situation needs more attention. Actually, a fire Holder campaign sounds good to me.

cube said...

It is despicable. Also despicable is how little press coverage this is getting. I've tried many sources and still can't get a roll call giving me the names of the representatives that voted to reject this resolution.

I called Rep. Wolfe's office and the guy who answered the phone couldn't (or wouldn't) give me the information, but he did refer me to opencongress.org, whom I emailed and was told they only list the full House votes (not the committee votes), but they referred me to the House site which I tried initially without any results.

What is going on here? Where is the transparency in government BO & Pelosi promised?

Somebody out there must've taken notes at this meeting. Somebody has to know who voted and how.

Hee-Haw. Donkey-speak for, "You're a frakkin' idiot and you don't need to know what we elites do behind closed doors."

Ananda girl said...

This one really makes me ill. We are supposed to be guaranteed the right to vote without intimidation. The video taken at the time, proved that was exactly the case... intimidation. If we do not protect this right, how can our system be taken seriously? Is it a sham or not?

Steve Harkonnen said...

Have any of you noticed lately that, regardless of what laws are in place, there's always loopholes around them?

This country is going to hell in a handbasket.

Sanctioned thuggery - you betcha. This is what happens when you elect an Uncle Tom into the White House.

Pasadena Closet Conservative said...

Two words: Open Government.

Eventually that phrase will be removed from our collective vocabulary altogether.

Brooke said...

How utterly foul. DO keep us updated, please!

xjd7410@gmail.com said...

coach outlet online
oakley outlet
kate spade
oakley outlet
marc jacobs handbags
toms shoes
louis vuitton handbags
coach factory outlet
celine handbags
nike roshe one
air jordan shoes
giuseppe zanotti
cheap air jordans
michael kors outlet
jordan retro 4
michael kors
longchamp handbags
adidas running shoes
coach factory outlet
replica watches
oakley sunglasses outlet
fitflop sandals
adidas originals shoes
ray ban sunglasses uk
michael kors outlet
ray ban sunglasses
michael kors outlet clearance
nike store
michael kors outlet clearance
louis vuitton
louis vuitton bags
chenyingying2016714