I was going to make a 'Rorschach' comment about seeing sex and violence in the birds/tree and face. Actually I just saw the face and the birds. But it's much more interesting if I commented about sex and violence. The fact that I'm even discussing this means that I'm not as much fun as I used to be.
18 comments:
Saw the face before the birds.
I saw the birds first and then the face. Very nicely done.
Have a fabulous day. ☺
I was going to make a 'Rorschach' comment about seeing sex and violence in the birds/tree and face. Actually I just saw the face and the birds. But it's much more interesting if I commented about sex and violence. The fact that I'm even discussing this means that I'm not as much fun as I used to be.
I love these kinds of images. Birds first, face a while later.
En Bonderenka: I don't know if it means anything, but I saw the face before the birds, too.
Both. It's such fun to try to hold both images at once!
Sandee: Yes, it impressed me when I first saw it.
LL: Lol. Well you know, sex does sell ;)
Jan: Glad you liked it. Funny how you and Sandee saw the birds first. Hmmm...
Messymimi: That made me cross-eyed ;)
Tree with birds.
I almost saw a face, but the two red birds at the bottom canceled that image.
Kid: Uh huh, you're with Sandy & Jan... OK.
I'd rather be with Sandee and Jan than Bill and Bruce.
Kid: Don't get all defensive. Bill and Bruce had nothing to do with this ;)
I am presbyopic...
I saw the face first, definitely...with two mouths... :-)
Z: I saw the face but with a normal mouth. Are we all freakoids or what?
Post a Comment